(navigation image)
Home Animation & Cartoons | Arts & Music | Community Video | Computers & Technology | Cultural & Academic Films | Ephemeral Films | Movies | News & Public Affairs | Prelinger Archives | Spirituality & Religion | Sports Videos | Television | Videogame Videos | Vlogs | Youth Media
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

View movie

item imageitem imageitem imageitem image

View thumbnails
Run time: 28:00

Play / Download (help[help])

(7.4 M)Real Media
(18.6 M)QuickTime
(48.4 M)Real Media
(95.8 M)MPEG1
(100.3 M)Ogg Video
(114.7 M)512Kb MPEG4
(118.4 M)512Kb MPEG4
(119.2 M)Ogg Video
(134.9 M)QuickTime


All Files: HTTPS

Resources

Bookmark

The Open MindThe Power of the Media, Part II (1990)

something has gone horribly wrong 8-p
Prefer flash? · Embed · Questions/Feedback?

Guest: Friendly, Fred
Theme: Media


This movie is part of the collection: The Open Mind

Producer: The Open Mind
Audio/Visual: sound, color


Individual Files

Movie Files QuickTime MPEG1 Ogg Video Real Media 512Kb MPEG4
openmind_ep498.mov 134.9 MB 
openmind_ep498.mpg 95.8 MB 
119.2 MB 
118.4 MB 
openmind_ep498_256kb.rm 48.4 MB 
openmind_ep498_56k.mov 18.6 MB 
100.3 MB 
114.7 MB 
openmind_ep498_56k.rm 7.4 MB 
Image Files Animated GIF Thumbnail
openmind_ep498.gif 749.7 KB 
openmind_ep498.mpg 5.8 KB 
openmind_ep498_56k.mov 253.5 KB 
6.2 KB 
Information FormatSize
openmind_ep498_files.xml Metadata [file] 
openmind_ep498_meta.xml Metadata 868.0 B 
openmind_ep498_reviews.xml Metadata 3.1 KB 

Write a review
Downloaded 7,818 times
Reviews
Average Rating: 5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars

Reviewer: Robert B. Livingston - 5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars - February 28, 2005
Subject: Professionalism and Conscience Go Hand In Hand
Part Two of Richard D. Heffner's conversation with Fred Friendly begins and ends with a discussion of integrity in journalism.

Friendly rejects the idea that contemporary journalism lacks good journalists by citing the integrity of Bill Moyers, Francis X. Klines, and Jack Nelson.

For those who suspect that they are engaging with unscrupulous journalists Friendly advises that they politely request to record interviews for themselves to insure that they won't be misquoted.

Friendly discusses the role and importance of journalists in society. Quoting Walter Lippman he says that "the journalist's job is to portray a picture of reality on which the citizen can act."

He relates democracy and an informed public by recalling how his mother told him one false thing in her life when she said that "What you don't know can't hurt you."

"She was wrong," he says. "What we don't know as a nation and as a citizen can kill us."

Friendly does not apologize for being an elitist: "Just as people will prefer junk food if that is all they get, they will prefer junk news if that is all they get. And that is dangerous for democracy."

Friendly laments falling standards at PBS due to its need to raise money. For him, the name of Public Television is a poor substitute for Educational Television because it obscures its nobler mission.

He reiterates (from Part One) how bankers control television to the detriment of its power to educate and improve people's lives. "Television has become a midway, a Coney Island," he says, "something that almost everyone in it is ashamed of-- but it makes money. Not good enough for me."

As an aside, Friendly discusses the role of television cameras in the courtroom. (He believed that if used responsibly they should be there, the Supreme Court included.)

Because they confuse news with make-believe, Friendly reveals that he would get rid of docudramas if he were granted his wish.

Friendly describes the most expressive question in journalism and how he used it while he was at CBS: "How do we know that?"

He says that if his subordinates could not answer that well enough to satisfy him, then a story would not go on the air.

The program ends with Friendly's thoughts about the Fairness Doctrine which he summarizes as the need for TV and radio to do programs of public importance, and to do them fairly.

"What's wrong with that?" he says. "You do not need a law to make a fairness doctrine work: what you need is a conscience."